>Eye candy was their priority, not the web's wellbeing. It was very easy to make stuff on it it was developer and artist friendly (still has lots of cool stuff

>Eye candy was their priority, not the web's wellbeing. It was very easy to make stuff on it it was developer and artist friendly (still has lots of cool stuff that doesn't exist), it was a standard, but performance wise it sucked, and I would find it interesting for you to tell me what "web wellbeing" is. I would say that any analytics, advertising, and (my most controversial opinion) javascript is bad for web wellbeing. Every issue you leveraged against flash is the same with javascript.