2 ms·
So I am speed reading this: DNA Methylation and Protein Markers of Chronic Inflammation and Their Associations With Brain and Cognitive Aging https://n.neurolog
by Ice_cream_suit 5y ago
So I am speed reading this:
DNA Methylation and Protein Markers of Chronic Inflammation and Their Associations With Brain and Cognitive Aging
https://n.neurology.org/content/97/23/e2340.abstract https://n.neurology.org/content/97/23/e2340.abstract
I read the abstract, in reverse order.
Discussion and Results first.
If it seems plausible ( much research is trash, churned out to pad a CV ) and interesting, then I scan the Methods section.
This heuristic helps classify 95% as utter trash or outside my current area of interest in less than 10 seconds.
If it seems seriously interesting, I then read the full text the same way ie: backwards.
At no point do I want pretty visualisations made by wannbe PhD candidates, full of misinterpretations, wishful thinking or outright fraud.
- ketozhang 5y ago> At no point do I want pretty visualisations made by wannbe PhD candidates See Figure (5). Your argument doesn't really counter any part of the scientific notebook. A notebook will still have the abstract and conclusion (result & discussion). The tools mentioned in the article describes how to restructure the methods, data, and figures. You're note going to look at these anyways until the abstract and conclusion intrigues you.