3 ms·
Ah yes the notoriously spammy .dev TLD. I guarantee you that .com, .net, and .org have far more spam and low quality sites than this stupid list.
by jagger27 5y ago
Ah yes the notoriously spammy .dev TLD.
I guarantee you that .com, .net, and .org have far more spam and low quality sites than this stupid list.
- chris37879 5y agoYeah, some people are morons and stuck in the original "If it's not one of the old domains you're not a 'real' website" mindset. Kinda makes me glad to know he won't accidentally stumble onto Flutter though, since bother their package manager and main site are .dev :P.
- altantiprocrast 5y agoOr golang at go.dev
- rewq4321 5y ago> some people are morons https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html
- emodendroket 5y agoI'll add that if you're getting unwanted ads for that many drug addiction recovery-related terms constantly, perhaps your habits do merit examination.
- dredmorbius 5y agoThe original generic TLDs have many highly-ranked legitimate sites. The problem with extended generic TLDs is that the spam sites have managed to become highly ranked. Yes, there's good stuff there, undoubtedly. But search engines can't find it. At which point it may as well not exist. I'm not a fan of outright blocking at this level without good cause, but it could well be worthwhile to block an entire TLD in cases.