5 ms·
I think it's similar to PHP, they're criticized by the vocal newbies who are chasing the newest and shiniest. For me personally, w3schools has been one of the
by forgotmypw17 5y ago
I think it's similar to PHP, they're criticized by the vocal newbies who are chasing the newest and shiniest.
For me personally, w3schools has been one of the most reliable sources of reliable solutions that work not just for the latest Chrome build but across many different browsers and platforms.
Given the cumulative nature of HTML, "outdated" is another word for "reliable and established", IMO.
- viraptor 5y agoThey were much worse before. See the old version of w3fools website: https://web.archive.org/web/20110412103745/http://w3fools.com/ https://web.archive.org/web/20110412103745/http://w3fools.co... They're better today, but it's still... let's say an equivalent of empty calories instead of a healthy MDN meal.
- forgotmypw17 5y agoI don't see how MDN is a healthy meal when they document only shit which works exclusively in Chrome and Firefox, while claiming everything else is "deprecated" and ignoring all other browsers. More like synthetic junk food, if you ask me.
- viraptor 5y agoSome examples would be useful, otherwise it's hard to tell what situations you're talking about. But looking at a random entry, they list Samsung Internet, Safari, Opera, IE, and others. That doesn't look like ignoring other browsers.
- forgotmypw17 5y agoAre any of those not WebKit?
- viraptor 5y agoIE is not WebKit.
- forgotmypw17 5y agoRight...