4 ms·
Assuming it's the NB0700 from the manufacturer's page: http://hvsco.com/sp_qx.asp?id=75 http://hvsco.com/sp_qx.asp?id=75 It has a VIA C7-M 1.6GHz. Assuming this
by 13ren 18y ago
Assuming it's the NB0700 from the manufacturer's page: http://hvsco.com/sp_qx.asp?id=75 http://hvsco.com/sp_qx.asp?id=75 It has a VIA C7-M 1.6GHz. Assuming this RISC is comparable to the 900MHz CISC intel processor of the eeePC, the eeePC is fine for (most) flash, including (some) games.
Flashlessness is a killer IMHO.
- SwellJoe 18y agoThe XO has a hard time with Flash, but can sort of almost play YouTube low quality videos. It's got a 400MHz CPU. So, I'd say a 900MHz equivalent will definitely play most low-bandwidth Flash content. And, I'm not sure I agree that not having it makes the system useless...I lived without video on the web for the first two years or so that I was on the net (using an Amiga--Real video was the format du jour back then, and they obviously did not have an Amiga player). It was still a seriously useful part of my life. While I think it'll have to have video for US buyers, since YouTube is such a core part of the online experience now, it wouldn't for folks in places where real broadband is not yet available. Without broadband video isn't useful option, anyway.
- 13ren 18y agoHey, I didn't mean it would be useless, just a killer for mainstream success. I gravely agree that more internet --> less productivity. :-(