4 ms·
Technologically speaking, I feel that OS X was a better choice (a more robust and developed platform). Qualitatively speaking, I loved everything about using Be
by peatmoss 5y ago
Technologically speaking, I feel that OS X was a better choice (a more robust and developed platform). Qualitatively speaking, I loved everything about using BeOS—how snappy it was and the way applications felt like they could be thin extensions to the filesystem.
However, as someone whose youth involved waaaay too many hours tweaking files called .fvwmrc, I knew that looks are important, but skin deep. Hard to say which aesthetic I preferred. BeOS’s stock blue background, golden yellow tabs, and simple icons always made me feel “happy” even if they didn’t feel as staid and sophisticated as NeXT.
- tambourine_man 5y agoYeah, NeXT was way more mature. Based on BSD, after all, what else can you say. And the GUI dev tools were second to none. But to the end user, the look and feel of BeOS hasn't been matched still.
- 0des 5y agoI had 3 simultaneously rotating 3d teapots on an early pentium.. Man I thought we had peaked as a society when I saw that, on my own machine!