> You're playing fast and loose with risk definitions, and arguing that until loss of life was guaranteed the employer had no responsibility to not force employ

> You're playing fast and loose with risk definitions, and arguing that until loss of life was guaranteed the employer had no responsibility to not force employees to risk their life. Not at all, I am just reading the article which makes no mention of this event being a serious risk more than 20 minutes in advance. Possibly you have better sources, but you should provide a link with the source.