3 ms·
Housing First seemed to be working in Utah. They achieved 90% reduction in chronic homelessness. A remarkably simple and cost-effective answer. Essentially it
by more_corn 5y ago
Housing First seemed to be working in Utah. They achieved 90% reduction in chronic homelessness.
A remarkably simple and cost-effective answer. Essentially it states “get people housing and then it’s way easier to treat the things making them homeless” plop someone in a home and then it’s easier to get medication to them and they stop showing up in the ER 4x a month. Get people housing and then you know where they are to check in on how dependency treatment is going. Psychiatric condition? Way easier to treat if they have a roof, heat, an address to send medication.
It is actually cheaper than just doing nothing and allowing people to remain homeless.
But then they stopped funding it in 2015.
“Man this remarkable looking approach stopped working!”
“Oh? When?”
“Right after we stopped funding it!”
“Huh, weird.”
- Eric_WVGG 5y agoI was about to chime in with the same comment. In actuality, they landed around 71%, but yeah, I'd still call that a huge success. https://www.sltrib.com/news/politics/2020/05/11/utah-was-once-lauded/ https://www.sltrib.com/news/politics/2020/05/11/utah-was-onc... The arguments for housing-first homeless solutions align neatly with Universal Basic Income.
- 0x0nyandesu 5y agoThe other 29% need to be sent to a re-education camp until they want to be part of society again. I'm not kidding. Vagrancy is a plague on civil society.