3 ms·
As I wrote, but to make it a little bit more explicit, the centerpoint moved as you panned. The vectorial stream was performed directly in WGS84. This allows t
by wakeupcall 5y ago
As I wrote, but to make it a little bit more explicit, the centerpoint moved as you panned. The vectorial stream was performed directly in WGS84.
This allows to have of a country like Germany in view with very little distortion. As the zoom progressed outwards, it would morph to mercator. Nobody really noticed (sadly), and the choice of falling back to mercator was also due to it's popularity making it sort of "expected" more than anything else.
The key point is that the reprojection was dynamic, and done on the client, optimized for the current viewing conditions. Stuff that today you can perform via JS without any problem if you forego the idea that maps need to be pre-rendered.
- jacobolus 5y ago> centerpoint moved as you panned If your display is tall and skinny and north always points upward, transverse Mercator is a good general choice among conformal projections. If your display is square or squat, then a stereographic or conformal conic projection is less distorted for any particular view.