5 ms·
This is pretty clickbaity. She was banned for, "pretending to be someone else" and restored a month later for, "incorrectly removed for impersonation". This per
by tinalumfoil 5y ago
This is pretty clickbaity. She was banned for, "pretending to be someone else" and restored a month later for, "incorrectly removed for impersonation". This person had, "fewer than 1,000 followers" before the ban.
I get hating Facebook is cool and NYT needs to get clicks somehow, but social media is a space where career content producers lose significant income regularly from automated TOS violation detectors. You could write this article daily about Youtube.
EDIT: 'Small Insta called "Metaverse" faced accidental ban, restored after month' There that's a title meant to inform and not be ragebait.
- DarylZero 5y agoBan was only reversed after NYT coverage. Can't run that story every day. FB knows how to control your mind though. They reverse the ban _in response to_ the news article, neutralizing the content of the news article in your mind. FB never lost money underestimating the public!
- thereare5lights 5y ago> accidental ban You have no evidence that this was accidental