The article itself is more balanced than the headline. In the second half it explains that hydrogen should be used in no-regret sectors where there's no good al

The article itself is more balanced than the headline. In the second half it explains that hydrogen should be used in no-regret sectors where there's no good alternative and points to Michael Liebreich's hydrogen ladder, which identifies more and less useful sectors for hydrogen. It's not advocating for a firm "No" on hydrogen.