3 ms·
Is RSS really a technology or a part of the failed attempt of having a semantic web (the real web 3.0) ? RSS is easily replaceable by just scrapping a website,
by polote 5y ago
Is RSS really a technology or a part of the failed attempt of having a semantic web (the real web 3.0) ?
RSS is easily replaceable by just scrapping a website, technologically speaking it doesn't make sense to have everyone making a request to website every minute. We could have a central service responsible for that, but I guess it will centralized and some people don't like that
- mdp2021 5y ago> RSS is easily replaceable by just scrapping a website A custom analysis by the user - maybe tech illiterate -, from every user, for every, supposedly complex, website, instead of some xml-izing wrapping over 'SELECT * FROM news ORDER BY pubdate DESC LIMIT 100'?! > a request to website every minute RSS takes less bandwidth than doing the same operation through direct visit. And of course, one is not supposed to do it that frequently; though again, some browsing agents may load pages more frequently than every minute.
- selfhoster11 5y agoScraping is measurably less efficient and reliable on the client side. Its "API" (page layout) varies without notice, where RSS will remain the same. I can only condone scraping if the official API is so convoluted that scraping the page is literally the easier option to program against.
- RNCTX 5y agoTTL is a thing.
- bluefox 5y agoIt doesn't mean everyone is making a request to a website every minute. I use http://gwene.org/ http://gwene.org/ for example. To me RSS or Atom are a major success, as the blogs I want to read almost always seem to have them. Those that don't, well, I used to scrape, but after a while stopped and forgotten about them. If gwene goes under, it'll suck but I'll have a gwene like on my own server. If RSS goes under, it'll go under here and there, and not wholesale. Good technology is resilient like that.