5 ms·
Perhaps for the first, or second, or tenth instance - but surely at some point, if certain senior people at Hertz know, or ought to know, that their system has
by caf 5y ago
Perhaps for the first, or second, or tenth instance - but surely at some point, if certain senior people at Hertz know, or ought to know, that their system has a track record of making incorrect accusations, and they continue to use it anyway, it must rise to at least a standard of wilful indifference to whether or not the statements are correct.
- kube-system 5y agoAccording to the statement by Hertz in the article, it seems that they believe the majority of the statements are correct. If there’s some memo floating around that says otherwise, then maybe it’s a crime.
- caf 5y agoIs an honest belief that there's a bare 51% probability that my statement is correct really good enough?
- kube-system 5y agoIt doesn't work like that. It's not graded on a percentage scale, it's pass/fail. "Knowingly" and "willfully" have legally significant meanings with their own standards of the mental state that qualifies. It is then up to the court to determine whether or not your actions have met those conditions.
- caf 5y agoI ask because "believe a majority of the statements are correct" can mean as little as "more likely to be correct that not" - it's pretty weak tea.
- deleted 5y ago[deleted]