> They aren't trying to convince you that the competitor is worse They are saying that performance on their chips is upto 1.8x faster in most common workloads.

> They aren't trying to convince you that the competitor is worse They are saying that performance on their chips is upto 1.8x faster in most common workloads. Also, doesn't need any expensive porting. They do compare performance, but have emphasized on cost and compatibility. If cloud computing has shown them anything, its that it is very difficult to be a monopoly player if your end users are insulated from your branding.