9 ms·

According to the 2020 census data linked below the percentage increases to around 24% for individuals who worked full time all year. I don’t think there is any

According to the 2020 census data linked below the percentage increases to around 24% for individuals who worked full time all year. I don’t think there is any easy way to find the more specific groups you mentioned. That’s not a large enough increase to consider making six figures as easy as “prioritizing” it or whatever you’re proposing. https://www2.census.gov/programs-surveys/cps/tables/pinc-01/2021/pinc01_2_1_1.xlsx https://www2.census.gov/programs-surveys/cps/tables/pinc-01/... In any case what you’re proposing is selection bias. No one should be surprised that people who work full time are more likely to make six figures than those who don’t. And yes, if you cherry pick a group of “professionals” who receive larger salaries of course the percentage will increase. And it’s back to survivorship bias for the “prioritization” examples you mentioned. Unless you happen to have a random sample of people who don’t make six figures but would prefer to.

chrisseaton 5y ago
I think you've just proved yourself that making 100k is extremely achievable in the US (1/4) for someone who even just bothers to turn up full-time.
- saalweachter 5y ago
  Keep in mind the "underemployment rate" -- the people who want to be working more but can't find a job that will let them -- is something like 12%. Being willing to show up full time is necessary but not sufficient.
- PaulDavisThe1st 5y ago
  When 3 out 4 people "fail" at something, I'm not sure that calling it "extremely achievable" is really a particularly suitable description.
  - shukantpal 5y ago
    Ahem, your statement assumes people even try - most do not. Especially given the "follow your passion" advice Americans are following nowadays.
    - PaulDavisThe1st 5y ago
      The GP was using a quote from the GGP: > According to the 2020 census data linked below the percentage increases to around 24% for individuals who worked full time all year. It said and implied nothing about people trying or not. GP attempted to cast this as "1/4 of people succeed, so it's easily achieveable"
      - shukantpal 5y ago
        It said and implied nothing about failing either. Also, if I look at the people around myself and see that 1 / 4 are able to do something, it would probably be easy. So it’s the GPs own self awareness combined with the stat.

chrisseaton 5y ago

I think you've just proved yourself that making 100k is extremely achievable in the US (1/4) for someone who even just bothers to turn up full-time.

saalweachter 5y ago
Keep in mind the "underemployment rate" -- the people who want to be working more but can't find a job that will let them -- is something like 12%. Being willing to show up full time is necessary but not sufficient.
PaulDavisThe1st 5y ago
When 3 out 4 people "fail" at something, I'm not sure that calling it "extremely achievable" is really a particularly suitable description.
- shukantpal 5y ago
  Ahem, your statement assumes people even try - most do not. Especially given the "follow your passion" advice Americans are following nowadays.
  - PaulDavisThe1st 5y ago
    The GP was using a quote from the GGP: > According to the 2020 census data linked below the percentage increases to around 24% for individuals who worked full time all year. It said and implied nothing about people trying or not. GP attempted to cast this as "1/4 of people succeed, so it's easily achieveable"
    - shukantpal 5y ago
      It said and implied nothing about failing either. Also, if I look at the people around myself and see that 1 / 4 are able to do something, it would probably be easy. So it’s the GPs own self awareness combined with the stat.