> ... Why on earth is anyone still using this stupid Marxist term for new ideas? > ... unless you are genuinely using it in the Marxist sense. The seems to be

> ... Why on earth is anyone still using this stupid Marxist term for new ideas? > ... unless you are genuinely using it in the Marxist sense. The seems to be the case, it mentions the fediverse, but as an incomplete tool to achieve what the author is proposing. The main idea I got from the article is "social ownership" of the internet. It seems that the author allows communities not backed/run by the state though. Maybe a throwaway line to appease critics.