5 ms·
Riiiiight. I'm sure it has nothing to do with a complete lack of competition (cf. how in communities where Google Fiber showed up, the incumbents were suddenly
by cure 5y ago
Riiiiight.
I'm sure it has nothing to do with a complete lack of competition (cf. how in communities where Google Fiber showed up, the incumbents were suddenly quite capable of getting gigabit fiber to households, and for a price that was competitive with Google Fiber, and a fraction of the price they were charging for inferior service before Google Fiber's arrival).
I'm sure it also has nothing to do with the billions upon billions of subsidies AT&T and Verizon have received to build out broadband and make it available everywhere, which they pocketed and then didn't deliver on. Cf. https://www.huffpost.com/entry/the-book-of-broken-promis_b_5839394 https://www.huffpost.com/entry/the-book-of-broken-promis_b_5...
If you really want to blame it on government, do it the right way: the government has not been keeping AT&T and the other giant telcos accountable for effectively stealing all those subsidies, and it has not enforced competition at the local level. Regulatory capture, and all that.
- christophilus 5y agoLack of competition is due to regulatory capture. Local governments often disallow competition in the ISP space.
- adamcstephens 5y agoAnd the regulations are captured by the companies who much prefer no competition. So we’re screwed by BOTH the corporations and the government. We need new laws, and smaller companies.
- driverdan 5y ago> We need new laws We need fewer laws.
- adamcstephens 5y agoWe can have both new and fewer. The current laws allowing for massive consolidation and monopoly are strangling the competitive nature of capitalism, and destroying democracy.