not a lawyer, but it looks like the issue is the bill asserts that companies who hire companies who subsequent to vetting use forced labor are then faulted for

not a lawyer, but it looks like the issue is the bill asserts that companies who hire companies who subsequent to vetting use forced labor are then faulted for something that changed after the fact. i think the assertion is a company like Apple or Dell etc has to repeatedly reverify that a contract manufacturer is still acting like they said they would.