3 ms·
the least morally hazardous way is to not take from the future at all. there’s no reason for the top-heavy not to take less into retirement. there’s also plenty
by clairity 5y ago
the least morally hazardous way is to not take from the future at all. there’s no reason for the top-heavy not to take less into retirement. there’s also plenty of excess wealth to easily avoid stealing from the future while still providing for all the top-heavy now.
- lotsofpulp 5y agoThe only way to not take from the future is to kill yourself after you become unable to support yourself.