3 ms·
The Headline here buries the key findings: > A _two-shot_ course of Pfizer Inc.’s vaccine has just 22.5% efficacy against symptomatic infection with the omicro
by SideburnsOfDoom 5y ago
The Headline here buries the key findings:
> A _two-shot_ course of Pfizer Inc.’s vaccine has just 22.5% efficacy against symptomatic infection with the omicron variant, _but can thwart severe disease_
and
> boosters from AstraZeneca Plc and Pfizer/BioNTech SE improve protection against the omicron variant to as much as 75% in the early days after the shot
There is also no reason to suppose that two doses, given a few weeks apart, are going to be a gold standard. Is a third shot a "booster" if it's a normal requirement?
"Two shots, and done in 3 months" is not what happens with routine UK childhood vaccinations against Diphtheria, Tetanus, Polio. (1)
No, the "two jabs at short intervals" course was taken because the metaphorical house was on fire and needed damping _as soon as possible_, rather than a consideration for what gave long-term optimal protection. That will come in time.
https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/899422/PHE_Routine_Childhood_Immunisation_Schedule_Jun2020_03.pdf https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/...
- Nathanba 5y agoThese findings are pretty irrelevant, obviously for all we know the first two jabs could also have 75% protection within the first few days and then can quickly wear off. 2-3 months is not a long time and suddenly you're down to 22.5%. We can safely assume that this stuff is getting published so soon to increase the vaccination rate of the population and not because it's actually meaningful.