3 ms·

Gee, thanks :D. I didn't know that at all and the article has no hints about that. I came to that possibility but it was reaaaally out of context and off withou

Gee, thanks :D. I didn't know that at all and the article has no hints about that. I came to that possibility but it was reaaaally out of context and off without prior knowledge. Thanks for confirming it, I really didn't understand what was what. edit: I took a look at the page again and there are no links or mentions of puzzles or something, I knew I wasn't crazy (or that dense) !

hhmc 5y ago
The hint is clearly in the sentence you're confused about -- that he has also created some puzzle games is the only plausible explanation.
- johnchristopher 5y ago
  FWIW, the first explanation I thought of was something like "he replied to people asking for help that he was busy doing some (jigsaw) puzzles and wouldn't answer for now, thus wasting people's time by playing with his puzzles rather than answering". edit: and by puzzle I meant that kind: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jigsaw_puzzle https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jigsaw_puzzle. Puzzle in my mother tongue is the word used for jigsaw puzzles. Other puzzles are called "brain teasers".
  - zem 5y ago
    ooh, that would explain why there was a small but steady stream of people posting jigsaw related stuff in rec.puzzles back in the usenet days!
- tunap 5y ago
  -- that he has also created some puzzle games is the only plausible explanation. Nowhere there does he claim authorship, merely possession of a collection. Without knowledge of his webpage or the games, there is more than 1 logical conclusion.
  - Talanes 5y ago
    It's in a postscript attached to a sentenced about how giving away software is what helps him sleep at night. I'm not sure how you can reach any other logical conclusion without throwing out data from the article in favor of completely off-topic items.
xapata 5y ago
It was implied. You don't need prior knowledge to deduce it, except the knowledge to ask the questions you wrote in your other comments.
- johnchristopher 5y ago
  Are you implying I am stupid ? /s

hhmc 5y ago

The hint is clearly in the sentence you're confused about -- that he has also created some puzzle games is the only plausible explanation.

johnchristopher 5y ago
FWIW, the first explanation I thought of was something like "he replied to people asking for help that he was busy doing some (jigsaw) puzzles and wouldn't answer for now, thus wasting people's time by playing with his puzzles rather than answering". edit: and by puzzle I meant that kind: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jigsaw_puzzle https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jigsaw_puzzle. Puzzle in my mother tongue is the word used for jigsaw puzzles. Other puzzles are called "brain teasers".
- zem 5y ago
  ooh, that would explain why there was a small but steady stream of people posting jigsaw related stuff in rec.puzzles back in the usenet days!
tunap 5y ago
-- that he has also created some puzzle games is the only plausible explanation. Nowhere there does he claim authorship, merely possession of a collection. Without knowledge of his webpage or the games, there is more than 1 logical conclusion.
- Talanes 5y ago
  It's in a postscript attached to a sentenced about how giving away software is what helps him sleep at night. I'm not sure how you can reach any other logical conclusion without throwing out data from the article in favor of completely off-topic items.

xapata 5y ago

It was implied. You don't need prior knowledge to deduce it, except the knowledge to ask the questions you wrote in your other comments.

johnchristopher 5y ago
Are you implying I am stupid ? /s