4 ms·
Your linked claim is that "AMP was also a anticompetitive plot to kill off header bidding". Your linked "debunking" is about AMP pages delaying loading for non
by jefftk 5y ago
Your linked claim is that "AMP was also a anticompetitive plot to kill off header bidding". Your linked "debunking" is about AMP pages delaying loading for non-AMP ads, which is completely unrelated to header bidding.
- CRConrad 5y agoThe claim, in a broader sense, was: "AMP is shit", or perhaps even "AMP is shit, and Google are anti-competitive arseholes". And those are certainly well-established enough by to make any attempt at defending against (either of) them delusional.
- jefftk 5y agoI'm happy to talk about specific claims if you want, but I was trying to respond to a specific false claim about header bidding and not signing up to defend all things AMP.