3 ms·
I side with the lead developer. The "reporter" clearly don't use any nuances and think that his opinions are "aligned with the general public".
by wdroz 5y ago
I side with the lead developer. The "reporter" clearly don't use any nuances and think that his opinions are "aligned with the general public".
- Deukhoofd 5y ago"Green should look like green and not yellow by default" is not an entitled opinion, and definitely shouldn't be met with the hostility it was.
- foothall 5y agohttps://github.com/alacritty/alacritty/issues/1561#issuecomment-422889256 https://github.com/alacritty/alacritty/issues/1561#issuecomm... describes why the maintainer thinks the opinion was entitled. I don't think your description is accurate.
- wdroz 5y agoThe lead explains in more details > The initial issue description basically said "the colors are wrong" with no description of what specifically is wrong, what you've tried (if anything), and a non-representative screenshot where your "expected" results are being skewed by the non-focused window dimming. You put the onus on us to engage and poke at your problem to find out what you actually want. > The defaults don't match your urxvt installation, and because they don't match your previous terminal, you insist they are somehow wrong. > "Aparently the defaults are poor" - attacking a decision based on your personal bias without consideration for why things are the way they are or that others may actually enjoy the defaults > "I think it would be a good idea to copy the default colors from urxvt." - this is basically saying the same as above but with more emphasis on expecting the project to change for and accomodate you. > "Should I open an issue to review the default colors?" - A harmless question by itself, but with context from previous comments, this is again expecting the project to change for you.