That just seems really presumptuous to me: I don't see anything in the article to support that outlook -- it even contradicts your position by emphasizing heal

That just seems really presumptuous to me: I don't see anything in the article to support that outlook -- it even contradicts your position by emphasizing healthspan over lifespan. Rather than your judgemental take-- Why not adopt the simpler theory that these are simply parties that can afford fund very expensive efforts which are extremely likely to fail?