> Reasons usually quoted for Moore's law's death are quite narrowly focused on a particular technology stack To give just one example, here's a paper[0] from 2

> Reasons usually quoted for Moore's law's death are quite narrowly focused on a particular technology stack To give just one example, here's a paper[0] from 2002 titled "End of Moore's law: thermal (noise) death of integration in micro and nano electronics" which claims "increasing thermal noise voltage (Johnson–Nyquist noise) ... has the potential to break abruptly Moore's law within 6–8 years, or earlier." [0] https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0375960102013658 https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S03759...