4 ms·
You're better off with at-home incinerators or depolymerizers. The volume, variety, and marketability of discarded home plastic make the economics recycling lou
by dehrmann 5y ago
You're better off with at-home incinerators or depolymerizers. The volume, variety, and marketability of discarded home plastic make the economics recycling lousy, and the feedstock would be just as bad for making plastics at home. The other side is if you look at what's being made with 3D printers, it's still limited to novelties and prototypes.
- 878654Tom 5y agoOn the topic of 3D printers, 3D has a lot of industrial, repair/replacement, design and medical usage so I would not say it is limited to novelties and prototypes. Some chirugs will do a test run on a printed hearth before they do it on a patient (they actually scan how the hearth looks like in the patient and model after it), protheses are being printed to custom fit per patient,... Yes, home printers are still very into novelties and arts. But for custom parts 3D printing is very common. As soon as mass production starts then yes, other techniques are much faster.
- beenBoutIT 5y agoApparently PET's safe to burn and has the equivalent energy content of soft coal - Penn State's found a way to make a coal-substitute out of it. https://tpsalliance.org/pdf/conference/2010/5B-Garthe-PlastofuelAutomating--2010.pdf https://tpsalliance.org/pdf/conference/2010/5B-Garthe-Plasto...