3 ms·
If Apple isn’t using forced labor then Apple shouldn’t be worried about the bill.
by randmeerkat 5y ago
If Apple isn’t using forced labor then Apple shouldn’t be worried about the bill.
- jjtheblunt 5y agonot a lawyer, but it looks like the issue is the bill asserts that companies who hire companies who subsequent to vetting use forced labor are then faulted for something that changed after the fact. i think the assertion is a company like Apple or Dell etc has to repeatedly reverify that a contract manufacturer is still acting like they said they would.
- randmeerkat 5y agoLike I said, if Apple isn’t using forced labor then Apple shouldn’t be worried about the bill.