3 ms·
Normally I wouldn't ask. I really wouldn't. But why? Why's this better than gcc -S? It's not exactly CPU-bound. For not needing libc, your own implementati
by lallysingh 15y ago
Normally I wouldn't ask. I really wouldn't.
But why? Why's this better than gcc -S?
It's not exactly CPU-bound. For not needing libc, your own implementation of syscall() isn't exactly hard, if you can't just statically link in libc as-is.