3 ms·
It's true. We generally forget that nature == nanotech. It's like we have an standard library out there, but with really shitty documentation.
by DanI-S 15y ago
It's true. We generally forget that nature == nanotech. It's like we have an standard library out there, but with really shitty documentation.
- superkarn 15y agoMore like reverse engineering with non-existent documentation. And not just nanotech, we have already copied/borrowed a lot from nature.
- billswift 15y agoNot just lack of documentation either. It is really complex spaghetti code with almost no modularization. What modularization there is (organs and even tissues) is on a gross (output) level, on the genetic (code) level almost everything affects almost everything.