3 ms·
First, size matters. Google and Facebook probably do not have a "family" feeling because they're huge. Growing a company to that size almost always means losi
by beloch 5y ago
First, size matters. Google and Facebook probably do not have a "family" feeling because they're huge. Growing a company to that size almost always means losing that feeling, as well as adding a host of inefficiencies.
Second, society has this strange idea that unions are for blue collar jobs. People think that, if you have a university degree, you don't need a union to represent you. White collar salaries have remained stagnant as a result, and white collar employees may lack avenues to address abuses, such as what occurred at Blizzard, that blue collar workers represented by a union may have.
It seems as though people are abandoning this prejudice. Perhaps, once a company is big enough and has a track record of not treating employees well, unionization should be the natural course for its workers, no matter what colour their collars may be.
Unions do have a bad reputation for inefficiency, but with remuneration falling behind the pace of inflation while productivity soars ever upwards, is it surprising that workers are starting to feel unions are worth embracing?
If Blizzard's employees unionize, you're going to see serious push back against some of the basic facts of game developer life. e.g. Crunch-time. I don't blame Blizzard's execs for being scared right now. They screwed up bad and now they're facing epic consequences.
- blagie 5y agoI don't think I suggested unions are for blue-collar jobs. Amazon workers -- including SWEs -- absolutely should unionize. Amazon pays SWEs well, but doesn't treat them well. Conversely, there are plenty of blue collar places which do treat employees well, even without unions. Size, likewise, isn't it. Historically, IBM, HP, and other big companies in the sixties treated employees well. Similar companies still exist today. It's all about the relationship between employer and employee. The guideline here shouldn't be size, income, or much of anything else except for having a "track record of not treating employees well." If employees would be treated better with a union, they should unionize. If not, they shouldn't.