6 ms·
The article doesn’t say that. Where’s an article that says they had to come in despite the dangerous storms?
by barney54 5y ago
The article doesn’t say that. Where’s an article that says they had to come in despite the dangerous storms?
- tylermac1 5y agoThis came across my Twitter feed just now: https://twitter.com/LCampbell_35/status/1469815411462000647 https://twitter.com/LCampbell_35/status/1469815411462000647 Seems credible based on photos.
- wk_end 5y agoGiven the long history of labour abuse that's occurred on Amazon's watch at their warehouses and for their delivery drivers, at this point do they deserve the benefit of the doubt? Do you think these people came in to work at the warehouse while the weather reports blared tornado warnings out of love for their job and loyalty to Bezos?
- dessant 5y agoNot sure why you're being downvoted, the events are already evidence that the facility was not shut down during a tornado that was known to hit the area. Workers were changing shifts when the tornadoes hit.
- tedivm 5y agoThis site has a very anti-labor bias, as most people here expect to be running companies (or already do).
- tpmx 5y ago"This site" has a very strong dislike for politically motivated speculation masquerading as fact.
- BingoAhoy 5y agoBoth you and the parent could be correct. I see a lot of spurious speculation in various forms but only certain speculation is more likely to get downvoted. Case in point the speculation surrounding the motivations of some unknown anonymous poster downvoting the grandgrandparent based off of extrapolating from other downvotes elsewhere.
- alisonkisk 5y agoThey weren't there on vacation. Obviously Amazon management chose to run the warehouse despite the weather.