4 ms·
It was more the state / polity / Manor issue - during the "fall" states fragmented into smaller parts that essentially could not afford large standing armies th
by lifeisstillgood 5y ago
It was more the state / polity / Manor issue - during the "fall" states fragmented into smaller parts that essentially could not afford large standing armies that would have the labour / coordination ability to mount a large siege.
But if that's the fall, you would assume an equal and opposite situation on the way up. As, for example, Rome grew in power there would be a series of manoral lords who had their own castles and Rome would have to assimilate them. But from my sketchy Republic history Rome was one of many city states competing - the city state was the unit size not the manor / castle.
It's almost like during the fall we fell further - sort of below zero whereas starting from zero we never went up through the castle stage.
- gostsamo 5y agoActually, you had the castle stage before the roman empire and this was during the bronz age with the palace culture. The city states of Greece were more like an exception with their counterpart in western Europe being the nordic Hanseatic league and the merchant city states of Italy. Of course, the technological level of the world was different and the collapse wasn't that bad to the south, so the developments of western Europe did not mirror the past, but you can find good enough similarities if you look carefully.
- lifeisstillgood 5y agoThank you - the Bronze Age palace culture (of which I know embarrassingly little) is a perfect example - interesting that we not quite fragment into exact smae shapes we built up from.
- gostsamo 5y agoYou have different technologies for food production, construction, and going to war. Climate and available animals might also affect the solution to a given problem. There are so many factors that affect it and that interact with each other.