4 ms·

> The compensation model is the problem. It doesn't mesh well with the way corporations function. If you don't charge for your product or services, corporations

> The compensation model is the problem. It doesn't mesh well with the way corporations function. If you don't charge for your product or services, corporations have no standard mechanism for addressing that some other way. FSF: Pardon me, here's a little process that encourages sharing so that everyone can... Corporations: gnawing on a giant proprietary turkey leg Doesn't Mesh Well nom nom nom No Standard Mechanism nom nom nom ** Corporations: yelling through a mouthful of turkey What in sam hell is Linux why does IBM have a billboard about Linux why don't we have Linux? Underling: Sir that's open source, our standard licensing mechanism wouldn't... Corporations: belching through a mouthful of turkey change the goddamned mechanism I want linux and pass me that mayo

antonvs 5y ago
> Pardon me, here's a little process that encourages sharing But they're following the process. What the comment I replied to was saying was that they should go beyond it. I'm pointing out that the lack of standard processes for doing that is what prevents it from happening. That's just the reality of the situation. Yelling at clouds isn't going to change that.