4 ms·
I don't want to waste your time with this, but: I can accept that perhaps I should have added more context, but if all I was responding to was "(they aren't ly
by R0b0t1 5y ago
I don't want to waste your time with this, but:
I can accept that perhaps I should have added more context, but if all I was responding to was "(they aren't lying because) they are professionals" it seems fine to say "professionals can lie."
In the broader discussion happening here it looks like people are mad at the mere suggestion that Amazon could be behaving in a way that is not in the best interests of their customers (and that the moderators are baseless coming to Amazon's defence). I'm open for waiting for more evidence, but the evidence we do have right now seems to justify most of the comments that are not obviously low effort.
You can ban me for whatever you want, but calling for the death of officials that violate rights is protected speech. Calling for the death of a specific individual is usually not. By retaining my comment you are not privy to any illegal behavior.
I've seen what bad cops can do. You can too if you look now. Voting doesn't seem to work. Can't vote when they've already killed you, anyway. Just in my personal experience we had some local cop that was ordering drugs online for who knows what -- could be planting them on innocent people -- and nothing came of it despite the reports filed.
I'd like to remain on the site as I draw great enjoyment from it. Guess I'll stay away from political topics.