2 ms·
First those developers don't get any money for their work, now you also telling them that the work they are doing isn't really valuable anyway? Did you conside
by tobltobs 5y ago
First those developers don't get any money for their work, now you also telling them that the work they are doing isn't really valuable anyway?
Did you consider the fact that half of your examples of worthy things are using the unworthy log4j?
- WJW 5y agoQuite a few managers I have spoken to will use the exact reasoning ("we could rewrite this in two weeks or so, why should we worry if it disappears?") and do indeed seem to think that the fact that because the OSS dev did not get paid for their work implies that it is low value work. If it was in fact high value, they would have gotten paid for it you see.
- didibus 5y agoAs a developer, if there were no free open source logging library, then I'd be paid to implement one at my work. It be a fun project, but because someone is willing to do it for free, and give it away, it's hard for me to justify to my employer that we should build our own. This is how the value is measured. But if you take a much harder task, like building a performant and safe JIT language runtime like the OpenJDK, you'll see that even in the open source model, people can't actually deliver it effectively for free. It often starts out from a company that later open sourced it, or it's backed by academia, and contributions require deep expertise, so sometimes companies had to have their own staff contribute to it on their own payroll.