11 ms·
If you find the conflict around frequentist and bayesian methods entertaining check out Jaynes' Theory of Probability, which profiles lots of great arguments an
by T_S_ 15y ago
If you find the conflict around frequentist and bayesian methods entertaining check out Jaynes' Theory of Probability, which profiles lots of great arguments and personality profiles. Also you might learn a few things about maxent, statistical physics, and my favorite: the mind-projection fallacy.
- aaronblohowiak 15y agoI can't find the book with that title, do you have a link or ISBN? http://www.amazon.com/Probability-Theory-Science-T-Jaynes/dp/0521592712/ref=ntt_at_ep_dpt_1 http://www.amazon.com/Probability-Theory-Science-T-Jaynes/dp... is the closest match but it does not seem to match your description.
- T_S_ 15y agoThanks and sorry--I misrecollected. The correct title is Probability Theory: The Logic of Science.
- jcarden 15y agoI've got a digital copy around here somewhere. Send me a message if you want.
- revorad 15y agoNot the full versions but still good: http://bayes.wustl.edu/etj/prob/book.pdf http://bayes.wustl.edu/etj/prob/book.pdf http://www-biba.inrialpes.fr/Jaynes/prob.html http://www-biba.inrialpes.fr/Jaynes/prob.html
- capnrefsmmat 15y agoAt what level is the presentation of statistics in his book? I'm interested to learn more about the application of statistics and Bayesian methods (as a physics major I intend to deal with lots of data), but I haven't taken formal courses on statistics yet. (Of course, being a physics major, I don't mind having to hurt my brain a bit to get through it, so long as it's good.)
- snippyhollow 15y agoBasic conditional probability understanding is sufficient.
- Jach 15y agoI've recently started going through http://www.amazon.com/Data-Analysis-Bayesian-Devinderjit-Sivia/dp/0198568320/ http://www.amazon.com/Data-Analysis-Bayesian-Devinderjit-Siv... and can highly recommend it. The benefits of Bayesian reasoning can be grasped somewhat easily without a detailed knowledge of the math, but at the end of the day scientists and engineers still need to learn how to use it and write programs using it to do stuff! One review mentions the book dives right into the subject, it does; I believe Bayes' Theorem is shown on page 6. Some people find a brisk pace hard to follow, personally I like it since I can always fill in the gaps with other material if needed. (Like Jaynes, or http://uncertainty.stat.cmu.edu/ http://uncertainty.stat.cmu.edu/ )