3 ms·
I suspect in this case he was quoting the other person directly, rather than trying to diminish the title as it applies to asset artists. This is an increasingl
by runnerup 5y ago
I suspect in this case he was quoting the other person directly, rather than trying to diminish the title as it applies to asset artists. This is an increasingly common way to use quotes in textual conversations, as a way to clarify which noun is being discussed. I'm not sure if its "correct" but it's increasingly common.
Rephrased (accurately for intent) I thought it would be:
> Just to clarify, when you say "I am an artist and I love playing the games I've made with friends and strangers", do you mean artist as in the game-asset creator type of artist, or artist as in a romanticized version of a software engineer?
I could be wrong. Maybe he is just being a dick. But I primarily saw a somewhat more charitable interpretation.
- shkkmo 5y agoif you are disscussing a word (or phrase) rather than using it, placing it in quotation marks is the correct way to do that. The usage of quotation marks in journalism to say things using other people's words or to imply doubt on if those words are correct has been growing looser and looser. I generally take such usage as an indicator of bad and lazy writing.