> When scientist A shows a result, and scientist B can't reproduce it, it does not mean the result is wrong Correct, but until scientist A’s result can be repr

> When scientist A shows a result, and scientist B can't reproduce it, it does not mean the result is wrong Correct, but until scientist A’s result can be reproduced by someone, anyone, relying on scientist A’s result is really more akin to a religious leap of faith, then science. When any belief based on faith alone is presented as an unquestionable truth, it deserves skepticism.