3 ms·
In his opening paragraph, he calls a sitting president a con artist. The first "source" he cites is his own article, written only a few days after the law passe
by howdydoo 5y ago
In his opening paragraph, he calls a sitting president a con artist. The first "source" he cites is his own article, written only a few days after the law passed, already calling it a failure. I don't care which "side" you're on, it's a stretch to call this news.
The real shame is that if the article were less biased, it would never have made it this high on the front page.
- lalaland1125 5y ago> The first "source" he cites is his own article, written only a few days after the law passed, already calling it a failure. And then proceeds to cite over 10 outside sources. Why don't you just point out why you think the piece is wrong?