4 ms·
Exactly, in fact I'm always surprised so many people still claim GA is better for practical implementations after all these years. My impression is that if you
by chombier 5y ago
Exactly, in fact I'm always surprised so many people still claim GA is better for practical implementations after all these years.
My impression is that if you want something compact that you'll need to either give up on performance (type erasure) or separate compilation (track every type).
GA is great for pen and paper proofs though.
- ChrisLomont 5y agoExactly - GA is nice for proofs, bad for code. I wrote an article in Games Programming Gems V back around 2004, showing many proofs of things one wants to do in computer graphics all derived simply using GA.