>Why are they subject to libel and defamation lawsuits, but Google, FB, etc. get to hide behind section 230? All the people you mention, whether media or tech,

>Why are they subject to libel and defamation lawsuits, but Google, FB, etc. get to hide behind section 230? All the people you mention, whether media or tech, are employees of their respective companies, so I wouldn't think any of them are protected by 230. They aren't third party content providers. I don't understand where anything you mention represents a double standard. And you seem to be referring to hypotheticals with the leaders of Facebook and Google, so that makes it even more confusing.