4 ms·
There is no evidence he helped her. Their main witness was a pedophile who lied to try get his own charges lessened. There is no case against Assange. The alleg
by choward 5y ago
There is no evidence he helped her. Their main witness was a pedophile who lied to try get his own charges lessened. There is no case against Assange. The allegations are bogus.
- jjulius 5y ago> Their main witness was a pedophile who lied to try get his own charges lessened. As far as I understand it, that witness admitted to lying about a lot, but I can't find where he ever was the witness to Assange helping Manning, or that he even claimed it happened. The original article[1] that exposed Thordarson's lies doesn't even mention that; it's only tangentially tied to the claim that Assange was Manning's accomplice because they used it to say, "See? He helped Thordarson, too". As far as I know, we don't yet know what other proof the government may have that Assange helped Manning along the way simply because there hasn't been a trial yet. Until that happens, it's impossible to say that there is no proof. Please correct me if I'm wrong. [1]https://stundin.is/grein/13627/ https://stundin.is/grein/13627/
- plandis 5y agoAre you saying this after reviewing all the evidence that the department of justice has or…?