3 ms·
It's not 'journalism' to release arbitrary secrets even if the transparency might be beneficial. Secrecy can be harmful in some cases but it's also essential i
by jollybean 5y ago
It's not 'journalism' to release arbitrary secrets even if the transparency might be beneficial.
Secrecy can be harmful in some cases but it's also essential in many ways, it's really not an argument at all. Nobody would be able to do their jobs otherwise.
- AnthonyMouse 5y ago> It's not 'journalism' to release arbitrary secrets even if the transparency might be beneficial. Uncovering and publishing secrets is the core of journalism. > Secrecy can be harmful in some cases but it's also essential in many ways Then they should do a better job of keeping the important things secret. But it's good that they occasionally fail.