I don't think "misinformation" is as clear cut as we think it is. For any subject with more than the most trivial complexity there are always multiple ways to v

I don't think "misinformation" is as clear cut as we think it is. For any subject with more than the most trivial complexity there are always multiple ways to view the information. We could say, "Man stabbed another person in the neck. That man is bad", but what if the stabbing in the neck was for a tracheostomy? Now apply this to even more complex situations. I think it really comes down to a statement like "there is no truth there is only consensus". How much in this world is objectively true? And before you answer that go back in history and look at what we used to think was objectively true and it turned out not to be.