> "CSS isn't powerful enough to style HTML however you want without having to add a soup of extra divs..." This is untrue by any measure. This might have been

> "CSS isn't powerful enough to style HTML however you want without having to add a soup of extra divs..." This is untrue by any measure. This might have been true in the days before flex or grid, but with those additions, there is no need for extraneous styling divs. > "...and classes that are only there for styling." That part is confusing. Classes? As in CSS classes? CSS has no other purpose than styling.