4 ms·

I am not talking about Hillary's emails. He leaked diplomatic cables. [1] https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/wikileaks-releases-classified-diplomat-cables-us-stat

I am not talking about Hillary's emails. He leaked diplomatic cables. [1] https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/wikileaks-releases-classified-diplomat-cables-us-state-department/story?id=12260376 https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/wikileaks-releases-classifie...

tchalla 5y ago
Very interesting. The actual war crimes are brushed aside but the person who revealed those war crimes are punished. I wonder how this would have played out if China or Russia did it.
yesbut 5y ago
He leaked war crimes.
- bladegash 5y ago
  He leaked war crimes AND he leaked the information I mentioned.
  - yesbut 5y ago
    He shouldn't be in prison and we should have a public holiday in his honor for informing the American public about the war crimes our government commits in our name and with our tax dollars.
jessaustin 5y ago
So what? A private citizen has no obligation to secrecy.
- gampleman 5y ago
  Let alone a citizen of a different country...
- deelowe 5y ago
  I'm guessing that's about to be tested in court. The overarching question is at what point does a private citizen/activist become culpable. Developing technologies and social networks (old school kind, not facebook) which are explicitly designed to enable the stealing/leaking of state secrets would seem to be skirting pretty close to the line of "I'm just a private citizen/journalist." This is doubly true if said leaks end up putting military personnel and government assets in harms way.
  - jessaustin 5y ago
    This is doubly true if said leaks end up putting military personnel and government assets in harms way. We don't need to consider that possibility. It has been over a decade since this information was released. If anyone about whom USA government cares had ever suffered any harm (even if they actually deserved it) as a result, the USA war media would have crowed about it until we had all memorized all details. Not even a rumor exists of anything like that, so we know it didn't happen.
TomSwirly 5y ago
Which revealed war crimes.

tchalla 5y ago

Very interesting. The actual war crimes are brushed aside but the person who revealed those war crimes are punished. I wonder how this would have played out if China or Russia did it.

yesbut 5y ago

He leaked war crimes.

bladegash 5y ago
He leaked war crimes AND he leaked the information I mentioned.
- yesbut 5y ago
  He shouldn't be in prison and we should have a public holiday in his honor for informing the American public about the war crimes our government commits in our name and with our tax dollars.

jessaustin 5y ago

So what? A private citizen has no obligation to secrecy.

gampleman 5y ago
Let alone a citizen of a different country...
deelowe 5y ago
I'm guessing that's about to be tested in court. The overarching question is at what point does a private citizen/activist become culpable. Developing technologies and social networks (old school kind, not facebook) which are explicitly designed to enable the stealing/leaking of state secrets would seem to be skirting pretty close to the line of "I'm just a private citizen/journalist." This is doubly true if said leaks end up putting military personnel and government assets in harms way.
- jessaustin 5y ago
  This is doubly true if said leaks end up putting military personnel and government assets in harms way. We don't need to consider that possibility. It has been over a decade since this information was released. If anyone about whom USA government cares had ever suffered any harm (even if they actually deserved it) as a result, the USA war media would have crowed about it until we had all memorized all details. Not even a rumor exists of anything like that, so we know it didn't happen.

TomSwirly 5y ago

Which revealed war crimes.