> You assume that people stay the same. What statement did I make which suggested that? Just that I pointed out that his current statements starkly contradict

> You assume that people stay the same. What statement did I make which suggested that? Just that I pointed out that his current statements starkly contradict Satoshi's statements about the nature and purpose of Bitcoin? > he used "bloody" word A quick search of my email showed I used it half dozen times in the mid 2000s and I am not british English speaking. > He could've faked all this but I don't think that's the case because he was pretty consistent So his name must actually be "Satashi Nakamoto" then, since he was most consistent in using that of all? :) > I'm still waiting for Craig to upload bank statement In the kleiman trial Wright was caught forging many statements/invoices/purchase orders. Why would you expect to find anything except another forgery? ... and why would you be waiting? Wright has already given extraordinarily strong disproof: When ordered by the court to list his bitcoin holdings and the list appeared in the docket, the actual owner(s) of thousands of coins from it showed up and produced digital signatures attesting that the coins weren't wright's ( https://cswarchive.info/csw-filed#145-Signings https://cswarchive.info/csw-filed#145-Signings ). So why hold your breath for easily forged evidence of a kind he's already been caught forging when there is unforgable evidence the guts the heart of his claims?