> but this piece of scientific literature is both very talked about and very little read Rightly said. I am quite sceptical of people claiming they have "Read

> but this piece of scientific literature is both very talked about and very little read Rightly said. I am quite sceptical of people claiming they have "Read" Knuth's TAOCP; Browsed? Yes but Read/Studied? Not easily convinced. But perhaps i am just being too prejudiced and cynical.