Good point, that may be what they meant. Although I would not count on all of those details coming out: for years Google has been warning employees against usin

Good point, that may be what they meant. Although I would not count on all of those details coming out: for years Google has been warning employees against using certain types of language that could in someway look bad from an antitrust/anticompetitive point of view. So I would expect that a lot of documentation, emails, etc will look anodine on the surface through self-censorship. I don't expect anything that comes right out and says something like "we must implement AMP to as a strategy to remove competition from header bidding". Instead it will mostly be just the standard talking points about user experience and load times. I could be wrong though: plenty of things have been revealed in things like text messages where people don't think of them as being part of an official record.