4 ms·
"significantly limit privacy"? You either don't know what this change does or find it "significantly more private" when an extension developer has full read / w
by gerash 5y ago
"significantly limit privacy"? You either don't know what this change does or find it "significantly more private" when an extension developer has full read / write access to your web requests
- ineedasername 5y agoI was referring to the much higher level of difficulty adblockers and the like will have in filling their intended purpose. It seems like this is the clear interpretation of what I wrote and that you may be purposely misconstruing my comment in order to level a soft insult and condescending language at me over an opinion you don't agree with. To give you a little benefit of the doubt though and assume you may just be passionate about the issue and don't intend to be insulting I will address your other point: Users giving away access to their web requests without realizing it is a problem. It is also one that can be addressed without making it much harder for privacy-minded users and the providers of those extensions to get what they want as well.
- unionpivo 5y agoThe only extensin I use (and a lot of people i know) is uBlockOrigin. After manifest v3 it will be worse off. Ublock origin provides a lot of privacy benefits, so people like me are 100% worse off. Well I switched to Firefox, only really use chrome for testing nowdays.